I was talking college hoops with a friend who attended a BCS-conference college over the weekend when the subject of the NIT came up. It didn’t take long to find his opinion of the tournament couldn’t be much lower.
“I wouldn’t see it as an accomplishment (to make the NIT),” he said.
And I’m not surprised he’d say that. For people in a BCS conference, making the NIT isn’t an accomplishment. It’s a satisfactory end to the season for many programs (though not the Kentuckys of the world), but nothing programs from those leagues would really embrace and celebrate.
As for myself, coming from a school that isn’t in one of the “blessed” conferences in college basketball, I have the exact opposite opinion of the tournament. Look at the at-large bids in this year’s NCAA Tournament – 30 out of 34 bids went to the six BCS conferences, and the A-10 snapped up two of the other four. That means two at-large bids were dispersed between the other 24 conferences in college basketball.
That leaves the NIT as the lone place for many of these teams to continue their season past their conference tournament. Look at a team like Niagara, for existence. The Purple Eagles had a great season, going 26-9 with an RPI higher than Maryland and Arizona, among other BCS conference schools to make the NCAAs. But because Niagara was from the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference, they really had no chance to make it to the tournament.
However, because the NIT exists, teams like Niagara get a chance to play on a big stage and potentially continue their season for a few weeks, culminating in the semifinals and finals taking place at Madison Square Garden. It’s a chance for schools to put themselves on the map that otherwise wouldn’t get a chance to do so.
That’s why I was so happy to watch Davidson-St. Mary’s last night. Because both teams failed to win their conference tournaments, players like Davidson’s Stephen Curry and St. Mary’s Patty Mills didn’t get a chance to shine on the biggest stage this March. But the NIT allowed them to match up against one another last night in Moraga, Calif., and the two put on a hell of a show.
Mills wound up with 23 points and 10 assists, while Curry had 26 points, nine rebounds and five assists in St. Mary’s 80-68 win. It was a great, entertaining game between two high-quality teams. Should these teams, particularly St. Mary’s, have been in the NCAA Tournament? In my opinion, without question. But because the NIT exists, Patty Mills gets to play for another month and prove how good he and the Gaels are.
For the elitists in the world of college basketball, the NIT may be a waste of time, and that’s fine. But for me, I’ll always look forward to watching it each March, and see the sport’s overlooked teams get a chance to shine on a stage they more than deserve.